Tuesday, May 31, 2011

The History of the "X-Men"

The new X-Men movie, which opens on Friday, is a prequel that takes place around the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis and will recalls the origins of the comic book from the early 1960s.  Indeed, the X-Men first appeared as a Marvel Comic in 1963, during the peak years of the civil rights movement.  The book would have debuted within a year of key events, such as the integration of the University of Mississippi, Bull Connor’s unleashing of police dogs on protestors in Birmingham, as well as JFK’s speech calling for a major civil rights bill. As a result, the “mutants” seem very clearly designed to serve as a metaphor for black Americans in this time.  Charles Xavier (Professor X) and the X-Men, who want to work with humanity, represents Martin Luther King, Jr. and the integrationist wing of the movement.  On the other hand, Magneto’s Brotherhood, with its doctrine of mutant supremacy, seems to represent Malcolm X and other black nationalists.  Malcolm X’s profile was particularly high at this time as he appeared on TV more than anyone but President Kennedy in 1963.  The connection between Malcolm and Magneto is again made in the final scene of the first X-Men film in 2000, when an imprisoned Magneto tells Xavier that he still intends to fight a war against humanity, “by any means necessary,” a famous line of Malcolm X’s.
Changing times meant that others could adjust the intolerance metaphor for new realities.  In the last decade, director Bryan Singer used X1 and X2 to make the mutants a metaphor for discrimination against gays.  The first film stresses the difficulties that mutants who have come forward have faced, while showing politicians trying to exploit the fear of mutants.   In the second film, we see Bobby Drake (Iceman) have to “come out” to his family as a mutant, only to have his mom ask “Have you ever tried not being a mutant?” While Singer did not direct the final film, X3 revolves around a “cure” for mutancy and debates about whether the mutants should take it or not.
Looking forward to the movie this week and will have more to say afterward.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

"The Event" and the Death of Bin Laden

The cancellation of the lowly-rated “The Event” and the killing of Osama Bin Laden may not seem related, but they may symbolize the end of the post-9/11 era in pop culture.  In the decade since the September 11th attacks, television and movies have been consumed with real and metaphorical terrorist  attacks.  “24”, which debuted two months after the attack on the Trade Center,  provided the clearest illustration of this phenomenon, with seasons revolving around real nuclear and biological attacks(2002-2004).  Jack Bauer, the show’s protagonist, routinely used torture, causing some to see it as propaganda for the Bush/Cheney administration. 
Other programs used a less direct approach.  “Heroes’” first season dealt with the possibility of a nuclear bomb going off in the form of a “nuclear man” who is predicted to explode in New York City.  Following the “24” formula, its second season then featured a bioterror threat.  The reboot of “Battlestar Galactica” moved the show from the original’s Cold War roots to a war on terror metaphor with debates over how to maintain one’s ideals in the face of lethal threats to human civilization.  “Lost” frequently dealt with the issue of torture, seen through the character of Sayyid, a former Iraqi torturer..
As the decade since the attacks continued, however, these kind of shows seemed to have less and less success.  Programs like “Flash Forward” and “V” that dealt with 9/11 style events garnered weak ratings.  The same went for “Terminator: the Sarah Connor Chronicles” and now, “The Event.”  Clearly, these shows were weaker than some of the ones mentioned above and viewers seem to have less an d less patience for the serialized format.
Still, as memories fade, it may be that the resonance of 9/11 will dissipate and Bin Laden’s death will only accelerate this process

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Superman's History

With the series finale of Smallville this week, one reader asked me to give some historical context to Superman, a character now entering his ninth decade in American cultural life.  Joe Schuster and Jerry Siegel, two Jewish-American teenagers from Cleveland, created Superman during the Great Depression, with DC Comics publishing Action Comics 1, the first comic book to feature Superman, in 1938. Many have interpreted Kal-El’s (Superman’s given name) flight from war-torn Krypton as a metaphor for the American immigrant experience in general, or perhaps for Jews trying to escape Europe during the 1930s.  Clark Kent’s sense of otherness  as an “alien” in Middle-American Kansas can also be seen as an expression of the challenge of assimilation for the immigrants who arrived through Ellis Island between 1882-1924 and their children. During the depression, Superman reflected the politics of the time, acting as a proto-New Dealer, taking on corrupt landlords and businessman.
During the 1950s, Superman again reflected the ethos of his era, emerging as a champion of “truth, justice, and the American way,” during the Cold War conflict with the Soviet Union.  This phrase, now closely linked to the character, first became central during this time (though it had been used briefly during World War II.)  The first Superman television show, the Adventures of Superman, premiered during this decade, starring George Reeves, from 1952-1958.
In the 1970s and early 1980s, Superman re-emerged with the Christopher Reeve films, which became the most famous and influential depiction of the superhero.  The success of the films can partly be attributable to the fact that Superman is portrayed as an incorruptible hero in the aftermath of the cynicism wrought by Vietnam and Watergate.  The film also served as a template for most of the comic book movies since then, clearly influencing Tim Burton’s and Christopher Nolan’s  Batman films, as well as Sam Raimi’s Spider Man series.
Indeed, Smallville, which premiered in 2001, can be seen as a 10-year prequel to the Christopher Reeve films and has become the primary representation of the Superman myth for Generation Y.  With the arrival of yet another Superman film in 2012, it seems likely that the character will continue to endure in popular culture.

Sources: Bradford Wright, Comic Book Nation, (Baltimore, 2001)
Erik Lunegrad, "Truth, Justice and (Fill in the Blank), New York Times, June 30, 2006

Sunday, April 17, 2011

The end of Smallville

After 10 seasons, Smallville is concluding next month.  Though the show has been wildly up and down at times, I haven’t missed many episodes since season 2.  If you haven’t watched, the show has essentially depicted Clark Kent’s journey from adolescent to Superman.  With the Seinfeldian rule of “No tights, no flying,” the program's longevity has allowed it to gradually depict a character’s growth in a way few sci-fi/fantasy shows have done.
The show has lasted because it has essentially been two shows.  Seasons 1-5 were a kind of Buffyesque (though not quite as sharp) journey through high school and early college, with Clark saving the day repeatedly in Smallville.  Clearly inspired by the first half of the original Superman movie, Clark’s parents, well-played by John Schneider (finally overcoming the stigma of the Dukes of Hazard) and Annette O’Toole (Lana Lang in the forgettable Superman 3), help guide him through learning about his origins and controlling his powers.  Clark’s relationships with friends Chloe Sullivan and, for a time, Lex Luthor, are interesting.  The major drawback is the on-again, off-again romance with Lana Lang, annoyingly played by Kristen Kreuk.
Smallville had a second act in seasons 6-10 because it allowed the characters to grow with the audience.  Gradually, Clark begins to use his power to help the world beyond Smallville.  We see the culmination of Lex’s  Anakin Skywalkeresque road to the dark side, Clark’s parents leave the stage (with Jonathon Kent dying in similar fashion to Superman 1) and Lois Lane (thank G-D) replace Lana as the love interest.  Michael Rosenbaum’s performance as Lex Luthor is the best portrayal of Lex, exceeding Gene Hackman in the original films and Kevin Spacey in Superman Returns.  Erica Durance has also grown into a good Lois.
The best thing about the show has been a new character in the Superman universe, Chloe Sullivan.  Played by Alison Mack, she has been the most consistently interesting person throughout the show, evolving from Clark’s love-sick best friend in high schools to his key ally in his battles againts various villians.
With the final show next month, old characters have been returning and have helped produce one of the better seasons of the show.  Look for a final scene with Clark donning the Superman outfit and flying off with the classic John Williams music in the background

Friday, April 8, 2011

Sports and Age

Anyone who knows me will not be surprised that I wanted to do a post on the Masters.  Indeed, this week marks the 25th anniversary of Jack Nicklaus’ sixth Masters victory at age 46.  All of the retrospectives reveal that our conceptions of age have changed considerably since 1986.  Nicklaus was considered over the hill at 46 and his two major victories in 1980 at age 40 were considered remarkable.  Fast forward to the present and 40 year-old Phil Mickelson is the favorite to win this week.  Furthermore, we have seen 45 and over golfers in the mix in a number of majors over the last few years, most remarkably when a 59 year-old Tom Watson came a putt away from winning the 2009 British Open.  Fred Couples (51) has a chance to win over this weekend in Augusta just as he did last year.  Shaping up to be an interesting weekend.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Mad Men (or lack thereof)

I’m very disappointed that there will be no “Mad Men” in 2011.  I started this blog to analyze the connections between pop culture and history and “Mad Men” was prime material.  The show was a fascinating take on the social changes of the 1960s as producer Matt Weiner arranged many of the seasons to culminate around a major historical event. 
In season 1, the show ends with the Kennedy/Nixon election (1960).  In season 2, it concludes with the Cuban Missile Crisis (1962).  And in the third season, Weiner did an interesting look at how everyday people dealt with the Kennedy assassination (1963).  The “change” wrought by the assassination also meant change for the major characters, with Betty and Don Draper getting divorced and several of the principals leaving Sterling Cooper to create a new firm.  In season four, the season doesn’t revolve around a particular event, but we started to see the Vietnam War come into play with Joan’s husband in the Army.
Over the first four seasons, the show has often been best in depicting the early years of the women’s movement, particularly though the characters of Peggy and Joan.  We see Peggy encounter the tremendous difficulties that a career-minded woman faced before the initial successes of second-wave feminism.  Despite mildly open-minded superiors such as Don, she still faces tremendous sexism in the workplace and pressure from family and friends not to work so much (who fear it will prevent her from finding a husband).  Joan faces a different set of obstacles in a more traditional position as an office manager, though everyone realizes the firm can’t really run without her.  She even gets a promotion with no increase in pay, a common phenomenon during the period.
I’m sad we won’t see (for a while) how things would evolve in 1966-67, when the fifth season would presumably get underway.  Beyond the historical issues, I’m very curious to see how Don’s new marriage to his secretary will work out.  Not well I would imagine.  What will happen to Betty, who was far less a presence in season 4, after her divorce from Don?
I feel that Don’s desertion from Korea and his forging a new identity is going to become more of a problem as the Vietnam War expands during the mid-to-late 60s.  With resistance to the draft becoming more of an issue, it would be hard for the U.S. Army not to take a hard line on him should he ever be exposed.  It seems that at some point everyone will know Don is really Dick Whitman and Don may regret not biting the bullet and revealing himself earlier.
Let’s hope for answers in 2012.

Monday, March 28, 2011

The Wire

I just finished watching season 1 of “The Wire.’  I heard a lot of good things about the show, but did not see it during its run on HBO.  It was very entertaining and I highly recommend it. 
The show seems very much influenced by the “Godfather” saga.  The show’s producer, David Simon, reveals a world where there is an interlocking relationship between drug dealers, the police, and public officials, just as Francis Ford Coppola does with the mafia and established institutions in the ““Godfather.”   The Barksdale family, the primary villains in the first season, seems very similar to the Corleone family.  Though the first season premiered in 2002, Simon seems to have been an early critic of the war on terror, criticizing federal officials for moving resources away from traditional crimes and toward the prevention of terrorism.