With
little fanfare, the county commemorated the 50th anniversary of John
Glenn becoming the first American to orbit the Earth on February 21. The inattention to Glenn’s accomplishment as
well as the constant mocking of Newt Gingrich’s moon base plan, culminating in
SNL’s February 4th opening skit, “Newt Gingrich: Moon President,”
reveals a significant change in American ambitions. The space program, once an
important source of national pride and influence on television and film, has
faded in relevance and NASA is rapidly headed toward obscurity.
The Cold
War provided the impetus for the space race.
Glenn’s triumphant voyage came after the Soviet Union launched the first
satellite into space in 1957 with Sputnik as well as the first man into space
when Yuri Gagarin made an orbital flight in 1961. The race continued as the United States beat
the Russians to the moon when Apollo 11 and Neil Armstrong landed at
Tranquility Base on July 20,1969.
During
NASA’s heyday in the 1960s, astronauts became national icons who received tickertape
parades down New York City’s Canyon of Heroes, as Glenn did in 1962. The space race gave credence in science
fiction as “Star Trek” premiered on television in 1966, with “2001: A Space
Odyssey” and “Planet of the Apes” opening in theatres in 1968. Even a silly sitcom like “I Dream of Jeannie”
(1965-70) took place at Cape Canaveral where Larry Hagman’s bumbling character,
Major Anthony Nelson, worked as an astronaut.
After the
moon landing, many NASA scientists like Werner Von Braun espoused visions
similar to Newt’s, imagining moon bases by 1980 with trips to Mars to
follow. Indeed, Disney World’s “Flight
to the Moon” became obsolete in “Tomorrowland” and was replaced by “Mission to
Mars” in 1975. With the moon race won,
however, budgetary pressures led to the scrapping of the final three moon
missions in favor of Skylab, a short-lived American space station. Further travel to the stars was then shelved
in favor of the more cost-effective space shuttle, which could be reused.
While
Americans gradually lost interest in space, the still-fresh memory of the
program remained important into the 1970s and early 80s. Science fiction reached new heights with the
incredible success of the “Star Wars” trilogy from 1977-83 and the consequent
revival of “Star Trek.” “The Right
Stuff,” (1983), with its heroic portrayal of the original Mercury astronauts,
fueled talk of a presidential run for John Glenn, then a U.S. Senator from Ohio. Despite the Hollywood
treatment, Glenn’s 1984 campaign barely got off the ground and former
Vice-President Walter Mondale and a then-unknown Gary Hart trounced him in the
Democratic primaries.
Starting
with the maiden voyage of Columbia in 1981, the space shuttle program produced
important scientific gains like the Hubble Telescope, but missions to low Earth
orbit could not inspire the national imagination in the same way a voyage to
the moon did. Over time, Americans began to only pay serious attention to NASA
when there were tragedies, like the 1986 Challenger explosion. That disaster brought about national
mourning, in part because it was the first time astronauts had been lost in
flight, but also because the space program was still a key part of American
identity. Witness the far less emotional
reaction a generation later to the 2003 Columbia disaster. Only the gimmick of sending the 77 year-old
Glenn back into space on Discovery in 1998 drew significant media attention for
a success.
The
decline of blockbuster science fiction reflected this to some degree. The biggest movie franchises of the last decade
did not occur in space but were earth-bound fantasies such as “Lord of the
Rings” and “Harry Potter.” While I enjoyed these films immensely, they were
largely backward looking, particularly LOTR, which seemed to glorify a rural,
feudal past.
Though
both President Bushes proposed returning to the moon, President Obama is
largely privatizing the program with the intent of eventually launching a trip
to land astronauts on an asteroid. Furthermore,
public support for space travel remains low in light of contemporary budget
deficits. The nation also seems to have
lost the passion for space to the point that Newt is mocked for the same ideas that
respectable scientists suggested a generation ago. This dynamic seems unlikely
to change anytime soon. As some have speculated, it may take a challenge from
another foreign power like China to inspire a revitalized space program.
No comments:
Post a Comment